Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 277 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 98% |
Arguments: | 333 |
Debates: | 3 |
Gay Marriage hurts everyone in three ways.
First: Marriage is a longstanding likely-hood with legal past which is a precedent for the creation of citizens by the natural process of birth without immigration. It is licensed process which allows a common defense of governing State and governing Nation to address the creation of new Citizen as baby entering into a Country from an origin outside of borders only represented by two people.
Second: Gay marriage hurts the public as it is plagiarizing a likely-hood of marriage and civil union that is a witness account describing a sexual innuendo as conduct which is not needed in part of the overall witness’s account of such type private contract. As these issues of public likelihood require a common defense to the general welfare Binivir and UnosMulier are not are not sexual explicit witness accounts for children under age.
Third: The constitutional separation made by the likely-hood’s license set a legal distance and boundary between medical use of donations in the form human embryo, and sperm. As the licensing of medical practice is now able to create a citizen like couples, at the expense of love and the preservation of life which set forth a living being by registration.
It is the United States Constitution’s Separation of Church and State which describes same gender marriage as illegal this is due to how it directs a witness under State authority. Ignoring the open plagiarism taking places, so we do not to drag out the many sides of this debate. A constitutional example of a title for two men who are making an agreement publicly so it can be witnessed is Binivir. See it is not sexually explicit and does not make an innuendo.
|