It is inarguable (per those legal definitions) that an abortion is a molestation in the legal and criminal sense.

An aborted child is a molested child.

In short...

A human being in its most basic state is the young of the parents who created them.

A child (their young) even in the first days of life (zygote, embryo, fetus) would qualify.

Like I said on the other side: Even if we can't agree on the exact moment that a child's life begins can we at least agree that it is that moment (whenever it is) that their rights begin? Or, should begin?

This debate question has nothing to do with cloning but you are still wrong.

If you 'create' a fetus in the lab..... it is still the 'young' of the person who created it.

That has nothing to do with the debate question.

Read it again.

I said she missed the point of the question.

She was trying to make it as though it was about whether or not the woman was molested... when the point of the question is about the molestation of the child.

I never said she was wrong.

I said that she missed the point and I said so because she didn't even try to address the question or answer it.

She used it to launch into an argument of her own instead.

I never said she was wrong.

I said that she missed the point and I said so because she didn't even try to address the question or answer it.

She used it to launch into an argument of her own instead.

LOL. Good timing on the edit.

You disputed the wrong person, Izzy.

You and I agree that it's a child.

Is that even english?

What are your thoughts on the laws that we already have that say it's a child?