If you ask me why the ball falls to the ground and I tell you about this thing I call "gravity", would you dismiss it as a cop-out because it doesn't explain how the ball was created in the first place to have it drop to the ground?

Is it worth refuting your post, being that it's more than four years old, you obviously don't post here much and your argument sinks to a pathetic low anyway?

If anyone wishes to challenge me on it, I'll refute it, otherwise, I'd rather just leave this post here showing my absolute protest against this post.

Aww. Back in the day when Joecav debated sincerely. ;)

No substantial proof to argue a deity's existence. Therefore the default position is not to believe it.

It cannot hurt us in any manner that any other marriage couldn't.