I like how no one wants to put the blame on the U.S. for anything. You go to countries like China and Zimbabwe as examples. Anyways, that has nothing to do with this rebuttal. One world government isn't going to answer that call. We're talking about efficiency. Can you really imagine the bureaucracy of one world government?! it would take centuries to get things done. Decentralized approach is more effective. It's better to have people/ other governments to keep each other in check than to have one big guy calling all the shots. It's just funny because with all your sides arguments, I see a trend. You guys are just supporting the U.N unintentionally. One world government wouldn't be very powerful but just enough for global regulation of some things.....sounds like the UN....
Regulate certain things? I'm confused by this. I get what you're trying to get at but you haven't convinced me. I'm going to assume that you are looking at this from a western perspective. Now take this into account when trying to mix you're perspective, western, with an eastern perspective.... you're view of the world is different than the rest. And how is one world government going to bring about something "better"? What is better? What are our problems now that a one world government entity would solve or be more efficient at? What do you consider an effective government? I would like to hear of some examples.
It's sad that one article has convinced you so quickly. Your statement has no point. You haven't said anything that revolves around one world government. Countries currently work together in "organized" manners. Trying to blame autonomy for the recent financial crisis is ludicrous. The financial crisis is due, in a large part, to a loss of respect towards what money is and its representation. It all started when we assigned worth by replacement of items of "actual" worth to those of "said" worth. If you took all of which we consider of "monetary value" (eg. diamonds, gold, silver, etc) and put it together it wouldn't even come close to the world currencies that are flying around today. How is globalization/one world government going to solve that so called crisis?
One word: Balance. One world government isn't the solution but just the end result of our obession with "bettering" the world. Do you know how peace results? From war. With no war comes no peace. It's dual natured. It's human natured. It is a never ending rollercoaster and we're all on it for the ride. One world government would just lead to more chaos. What happens when you hold all the power and control? That's all a "world government" would become. One giant agenda, and what would that be? Who's to say you'd have a say? And finally, how do you find a balance if there is nothing to balance on?
