Return to CreateDebate.comseriousbusiness • Join this debate community

Serious Business


JustIgnoreMe's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of JustIgnoreMe's arguments, looking across every debate.
JustIgnoreMe(4290) Clarified
1 point

though, in fairness, some people really are terrible singers... ;)

Then you are not using the Bible to determine what morals, etc. are good - you are using your own faculties/morals to determine what parts of the Bible are good.

JustIgnoreMe(4290) Clarified
1 point

And how does a protest demanding equal treatment by their government or having pictures of that protest land in a newspaper hurt anyone?

Should no one ask for anything - since it might be denied?

JustIgnoreMe(4290) Clarified
1 point

I think they are referring to organizations that are experts in the field and that this is more of an appeal to authority than just an ad populum argument.

Santa Claus, or the tooth fairy were only for example - the question remains:

Do you still believe in everything you believed in when you were young? If not, what convinced you otherwise?

never had a reason to doubt

- the bible contradicts science ref ref (e.g. says there was an earth with an atmosphere and trees and grass and night and day, etc. before there was a sun)

- it contradicts history ref

- it makes unfulfilled prophesies ref

- it makes self-contradictory claims about God (e.g. is it possible for an all-powerful god to make a stone that god cannot lift?)

- it tells similar stories that existed in close by regions (e.g. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epic_of_Gilgamesh )

- it even contradicts itself! ref ref ref

there certainly is "reason to doubt", you just choose not to

I've believed in him since I was young

Do you still believe in everything you believed in when you were young (Santa Claus, tooth fairy, that the earth is basically flat), etc.? If not, what convinced you otherwise?

I almost forgot the best one. What were Jesus' last words? You would think that might be important to get right, but out of the 4 gospels - Jesus has 3 different last words.

Matthew 27:46 -

About the ninth hour Jesus cried out in a loud voice, "Eloi, Eloi, lama sabachthani?" - which means, "My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?"

Mark 15:34 -

And at the ninth hour Jesus cried out in a loud voice, "Eloi, Eloi, lama sabachthani?" - which means, "My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?"

Luke 23:46 -

Jesus called out with a loud voice, "Father, into your hands I commit my spirit." When he had said this, he breathed his last.

John 19:30 -

When he had received the drink, Jesus said, "It is finished." With that, he bowed his head and gave up his spirit.

he spoke to me after that and said he was lying to you - then we had a good laugh (and a good scotch)

maybe you mean regional cooling and warming, but the entire globe cooling and warming at the same time is not possible unless you have a new brand of physics you want to spring on us.

and whether or not anyone is depressed is not a valid arguement that they are right or wrong.

“Reality has a well-known liberal bias.” - Stephan Colbert

what do you use to tell what parts of the bible are completely true and what parts are completely made up?

been there done that - it is an entertaining read to see what people are willing to believe with sufficient unknowns.

for those who haven't gone back and read again with fresh eyes - here's a good example of of the fun you can have:

The serpent told the truth!!

re-read the garden of eden fable and you will see that:

God told Adam that the day he eats the fruit of that tree he will die

the serpent (who at that time had feet) said No you won't die, you will learn the difference between good and evil

eve and adam ate the apple

THEY DID NOT DIE! Adam lived 930 more years

* they learned the difference between good and evil - just like the serpent said (and like the name of the tree would suggest)

Moral of the story: God lied! the serpent told the truth!

to cut it of at the pass for those who say that after eating the apple they became destined to die, keep reading - there was also a tree of life in the garden (the reason they were kicked out) which would not be necessary if they were going to live forever from the beginning.

presumably if you believe in the big bang then you don't believe in the god of Abraham from the old testament who created an earth with water and grass and trees and night and day - before there was a sun or moon. Gen 1:1-16

also, the balance of nature is exactly how evolution works - not a benevolent god. how would the extinction of most species that have ever existed including humanoid species like Neanderthal be considered benevolent? what was their purpose - if they had none, isn't it then possible that we would have none?

ludacris ad hominem assertion by someone who, of course, presents no evidence for his argument

an example of the fear employed to get people such as yourself to believe i suspect

what makes me feel more and more correct that there is no god is that the explanations just boil down to "of course he [exists]"

although your solution is a god with infinite power, infinite knowledge, infinite presence, infinite morality, and has existed infinitly. if 2 infinitly existing planes of energy collided and caused the big bang - that would require infinite time, but no morality or involvement/presensce in our current universe. there are many explainations that do not require a god to create our universe - the fact that we haven't narrowed it to one for you does not mean the demonstrably flawed bible is correct

"as a Catholic, I DO believe in God"

nice tautology but that's not really a reason for believing is it? If your kid asked you why you belive and didn't just accept because your Catholic, how would you explain it to them

I agree mostly with your reasoning on why religion attacks science, but i don't think most people realize that this argument is showing up as supporting belief in god. Since it wasn't tagged, I think it is getting a lot of 'i wish we could all get along' points but giving them to the supporting position.

This may be a problem with the site counting points for non-tagged arguments for one-side or the other.

see Miller Urey and the many other experiments that deal with origins of life from inorganic material to organic material (amino acids, etc)

Supporting Evidence: Miller Urey (en.wikipedia.org)

god created animals then man and woman in Gen 1:24-27

but he created man first, then animals, then woman in Gen 2:18-22

God told Noah to take a male and female of every animal Gen 6:19-20 and four verses later says to bring 7 pairs of every clean animal and 2 of animals that are not clean Gen 7:2

Even the lineage of Jesus doesn't get further than Joseph and Mary without contradicting itself

Supporting Evidence: more on lineage (www.duncanproductions.com)

so if i was french irish does that mean i would have to half-believe in god, or believe in a different god? If you feel compelled to believe your parents that doesn't mean they are right.

hmmm - what argument would you use to prove them wrong exactly? since that is what we are interested in here...

you can debate faith in some regards - if someone believes god makes lightning and uses it to smite people, then we show how lightning actually works - then the person of faith can either believe their god does not exist, or is less powerful in that it no longer is responsible for lightning, or made it possible for you to discover how lightning works but also still controls it, etc.

when given enough fallacies - 6000 year old earth etc a person is either left with a much weaker god that only does whatever you can't prove it didn't do (and many claims of things that it did which you can prove unlikely), or no god at all.


1 of 2 Pages: Next >>

Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]